Sound & Archeology: Vintage Marantz

— by William Caraher

In my first post for Part-Time Audiophile, I mused about the relationship between hi-fi and reality, and concluded that anything that encourages us to reflect on the meaning of reality has a place within humanity’s larger philosophical project. (And this should justify my need to spend all available household income on stereo gear. It’s for the good of all humanity.)

These epistemological questions come pretty easy to me in day job, as a historian and archaeologist. I think a good bit about the evidence for past reality. In fact, the goal of the historical and archaeological method is to show how the remaining bits and pieces from the past can tell us about the past. At the same time, we’re pretty committed to the idea that even the best preserved archaeological remains or historical documents are not the same today as they were in the past. In archaeology, for example, scholars have long ago the “Pompeii Premise” which imagined the remains of the Roman town buried by Vesuvius preserved a distinct moment in the past. We now realized that Pompeii was much like our own homes and towns: a pastiche of half-completed home improvement projects, ignored problems, well-kept public spaces, and neglected back allies. All these show signs of wear-and-tear accumulated over decades and the buried city reveals not a single moment, but a generation of past use.

This is all to say that I bought a stereo receiver on ebay this past week. It’s a Marantz 2235B, a classic example of Marantz’s house sound from the late 1970s. It barely worked when I got it in a nondescript box, but after a trip to my local stereo and TV repair shop, a thorough cleaning, a new speaker relay, and some balancing, it now sounds… as good as new? Or pretty darn good? It’s driving a pair of Zu Omen speakers in my living room and providing us with a well-worn approximation of the Marantz house sound of the 1970s.

Ok, I can already hear the eye-rolling and clucking of people who know the risks of buy used and “vintage” hi-fi equipment. A recent trip to a few high-end stores brought with it constant reminders from sales people that “audio has changed a lot over the past decade” whenever I mention equipment over 5 years old much less pushing 35. I did enjoy reading Mal’s report on the Burwell and Son’s room at the California Audio Show which featured restored Altec VOTT which were stunningly modern and vintage. These gorgeous speakers were “reconditioned and restored to meet modern standards”.

In the hour or two before I connected my un-reconditioned and unrestored Marantz to my speakers, I read the blogs that discuss the need to re-cap amplifiers over 20 years old to hear them as they were meant to sound and those who say that modern capacitors do not sound at all like the originals from the 1970s. This is all makes sense to me, of course. Sonic memory being a bit of a tricky thing over the course of a single listening session would be a bit more problematic over 40 years. Complicating thing further, the Marantz itself doesn’t make any sound at all; that’s the job of the speakers and finding speakers that could sound as they did in the 1970s returns us to the same questions confronting the amp. Could they be restored to sound like they did in the 1970s without find some kind of audiophile Pompeii full of new-old stock gear preserved in oxygen free time capsule. At this point, you’re probably wondering what the hell I’m taking about.

So I plugged in the Marantz and my Zu Omens and put on some music. The little Marantz filled the room with a lush midrange and a rolled off treble. It took the potential harshness from the Zus and replaced it with a warm immediacy that was both as engaging as the Zus have ever sounded but far more relaxed and smooth than my 30 years newer Peachtree Decco. The bass was not tight and the lower midrange was exaggerated, but the overall presentation was plausible and attractive. Inspired by Mal’s apologetic review of Zu room, I put in Joe Strummer’s Streetcore and heard the unrefined (unretouched in many cases) character of his voice swell and crack in a new way. Jack White’s plaintiff wails, on the other hand, lost a bit of the immediacy produced by the Peachtree. Paul Simon’s remastered Graceland regained a bit of the grace lost through an antiseptic remastering through this system and the genius of the Mekon’s Fear and Whiskey gained a (possibly misplaced) elegance and refinement.

Was this what Marantz gear sounded like in the 1970s? Was this what recording engineers and producers of albums in the 1970s heard?

Or was this alluring and ethereal sound the fortuitous product of deteriorating capacitors and other electronics, 21st century speakers, a new and un-burned in speaker relay, and some seriously sketchy speaker cables. My Marantz 2235B was an archaeological project and an assemblage of interventions producing something wonderful, mysterious, and engaging. Issues of transparency, fidelity, and reality dissolve into listening pleasure as the archaeological assemblage filled my room with both visceral and intellectually-demanding artifacts of sound

Scot made the implicit comparison between fine bourbon and stereo equipment in a post a few weeks ago. Marantz was famous for its “two martini sound”. I’ll leave it for someone else to tell me whether the lovely receiver playing in my living room now embodies this evocative transferred epithet while I turn it up and listen to the archaeology of sound.


  1. Try to get hold of some Sid Smith era Marantz and I think you will see where the two martini expression comes from.

  2. Regarding recapping…A friend generously gave me his old Spica TC-50 speakers, and when they arrived (vintage, never refurbished) I happily listened to them for a while. I then pulled the crossovers and replaced all the caps. The difference in sound was quite stunning – much cleaner but also much hotter in the treble (which I’ll probably pad out with some resistors). So yes, our aural memory isn’t always reliable, but sometimes there really is a difference.

  3. Just now listening to some Zeppelin on my newly re-capped 1976 Kenwood KA-7300 integrated powering some JBL 4410 studio monitors. All is well in the vintage world… Have to swap in my L100’s in the next day or two and travel back even farther in time. Rock on!

  4. I’m pretty convinced that you could put together a system of turntable, amp, and speakers minimum of 50 years old that would sound as good or better than the typical $100,000 system you hear at audio shows. For the right cartridge you might have to move up to 1980 or so, You might need to refresh the amp with new caps etc.,

    Bad for the industry. Great for the hobbyist.

  5. You should really partner that old Marantz with a Dual 10 or 12 series or AR Turntable, perhaps you can find a vintage Thorens, You can build a classic Ortofon Super OM 40 Cartridge by picking up their new OM10 with a 40 stylus. After all that Receiver certainly had one of those tables and a Teac or Tandberg Reel to Reel and maybe an Advent Cassette deck too.

  6. Interesting premise to this article. In my mind’s ear (?), I can still hear (or so it seems to me) my first stereo system, acquired back in the late 1960s: JBL L100, JVC receiver, cheap Garrard TT (not the 301 alas). No CDs then, and cassettes came somewhat later, so it was all first-issue LPs. I can still remember seriously rocking to The Doors and Led Zep on that system. It often seems all my later systems failed to measure up to the analog glory of that system. But maybe that is my mind playing tricks on me. Could I have that system now, as it was then, how would it sound to me? I don’t know, but it would be nice to find out. But it was Heraclitus who said, “No man ever steps in the same river twice.” All is change.

4 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Sound and Archaeology | The Archaeology of the Mediterranean World
  2. Friday Varia and Quck Hits | The Archaeology of the Mediterranean World
  3. My Year in Music | The Archaeology of the Mediterranean World
  4. Archaeology and Audiophilia | The Archaeology of the Mediterranean World

Comments are closed.