Siltech Classic Legend 880 Cables | REVIEW


siltech classic legend 880

Journey To Ixtland

When I first started writing for Part-Time Audiophile, Scot Hull and Marc Phillips asked me if I wanted to do some cable reviews. I replied something like, “I’m not a believer. Since becoming a mastering engineer I’ve never been able to hear differences in wire, so no, I doubt I’d ever want to review cables.” I then proceeded to skewer anyone on the PTA staff who were believers as having fallen prey to psychological mental traps, as well as common errors in judgment called scientific names such as confirmation bias, aka The McGurk Effect. “Stella, look at all these pretty Siltech Classic Legend 880 cables. Don’t they sound fabulous?”

Words and Photos by Dave McNair

Well, times have changed, y’all. I now can confidently attest to being able to hear differences, albeit very small ones, in cables. WHUUT? I know. Makes no sense whatsoever. The naysayers will be like, “Oh boy, he drank the Kool-Aid.”

The true believers will exclaim, “Now he knows. Welcome to the club.”

Not so fast, Franklin.

After being an avowed tweakaholic in my earlier days (yes, I even used The Green Pen on CDs), I made a hard turn into a test methodology that showed me conclusively that all that kind of stuff was complete mass hysteria. I’m tentatively back.

But this time, things are a little different.

siltech 880

Siltech Classic Legend 880–The Loom

Like many readers, I’ve heard the Siltech name for years. That’s not surprising, given that this Netherlands-based operation has been making cables since 1983. From the beginning, Siltech has been heavily invested in research to determine the hows and whys of perceived sonics. The company wanted to determine if a change in perceived sonics could be measured. Apparently, it can. Siltech correlates perceptions with those measurements for use in design and manufacturing methods in their various lines.

If you’re a cable denier, I know what you’re thinking. Just because it can be measured, does that make it audible? That was my line of reasoning but let’s go with it for a minute, okay?

Siltech (SILver TECHnology) is usually associated with the fundamental concept that silver is the best metal for cabling. However, there is more to the story. The entry-level Explorer series, for example, uses a very pure 6N mono crystal copper with a mix of Kapton and Teflon for insulation.

The next level up is their Siltech Classic Legend series, which includes the Anniversary and Legend. The top-shelf Royal Signature line consists of the Crown, Double Crown, and the uber high-end –  Triple Crown series. The Triple Crown and Double Crown series use monocrystal silver, the others use predominantly silver with a small amount of gold. The silver/gold metallurgy is said to be used as a method for filling microscopic cracks in the silver to create more continuity for an electrical signal to traverse.

The Siltech Classic Legend 880 loom I’m reviewing here has SIltech’s ninth generation G9 silver/gold conductors and a combination of Teflon and PEEK (Polyether ether ketone) for insulation. I found out what those bulky barrels on the ends of the cables are for, and it’s not just the bling factor. The barrel allows the fat bulk of the cable to have slimmer, easier to deal with terminations. The barrels also features indicators for proper direction, as well as the model and serial number.

The technical and subjective descriptions on the Siltech website, by the way, are fascinating. There is a lot to digest and it’s not of the typical marketing-copy variety, either.  I got the distinct feeling these guys are not playing around.

dave mcnair system

Test Methodology

After years of looking for ways to quantify small changes in sound for an audio device under test (DUT), I’ve found some guidelines that work for me. While searching for a signal path with the least or most pleasing color for use in my mastering chain of gear, it’s important that I don’t fool my ear and buy something that is initially exciting but will end up not as likeable in the long run. It’s happened before. I figured out that what I thought was an amazing ADC or DAC or equalizer, turned out to simply be a little louder than what I compared it to. So the first rule is scrupulous level matching.

Most audio peeps know that aural memory is short and fleeting, so I have to be able to instantly switch. Then, just as important, simply switching during the flow of music is not a great idea because the music is constantly changing. I’ve switched while a song plays and thought device B was a little warmer. Turns out that exact second I switched was when the vocalist got a little closer to the mic, or something of that nature. So here’s how I get around these issues.

I devise a way to record the same music playing through the DUT and my control device, line both files up in my workstation, and make sure the levels are as close to identical as I can. Then I pick a few bars, maybe five or six seconds, that have lots of information. Then play I that looped section about five or six times, which pounds the character of a vocal sound or transient impact or image cues into my brain. THEN I hit a button that routes the version recorded through the DUT to my system. Sometimes I shuffle the deck, so to speak, and it becomes more of a blind switch.

I’ve heard lots of audiophiles dismiss instant switching for a variety of reasons. I can maaaybe get behind “the switch-has-too-much-of-a-sound and will obscure small differences.” My method only changes the digital routing. It’s totally colorless. I’m using a mastering grade Prism ADA8-XR for conversion and while not being 100% neutral, it has all the resolution I need for comparisons.

The other assertion is that you have to listen for a long period of time to adequately internalize the subtleties of some sonic signatures, like cables. I call bullshit on that one. Our brains just rewire over a long enough time period. It’s science. Look it up.

I’ve used this test methodology several times before in hi-fi reviews and it’s always instructive. In fact it’s how I finally came to hear small differences between line-level cables. Obviously, not all components can be tested in this way–power amps, speakers, and speaker wire come to mind. But cables are a natural.

siltech power cables

Siltech At The Studio

The system at the studio consists of a pair of Acora Acoustics SRC-2 loudspeakers powered by a pair of Pass Labs XA-200.8 amps and fed by my custom Knif Audio mastering controller. Jonte Knif is a Finnish audio genius who builds an audiophile-level mastering controller with a minimalist, single-ended design using his own discrete op-amps, select Analog Devices chips, and Elma switches. It has a superb yet extremely subtle sonic imprint. The monitor output of the Knif feeds a Prism Sound Dream DA-2 as the monitor DAC which I had connected to the amps with Siltech Classic Legend 880.

Here’s what I heard:

I used two great-sounding, pre-mastered mixes off of a recent mastering project, 24bit at 96K. I plugged the (source) DAC into the ADC (one Prism Sound ADA8 XR does both) with a variety of balanced XLR cables and recorded at 24/96 in my Sequoia workstation. This is commonly known as a loopback test. The test samples were Mogami 2549, Terry Audio chrome pin, Cardas Clear Beyond, and the Siltech CL 880. I compared captures of the different cables by lining them up on separate tracks fed to different outputs, digitally switchable on my console to the monitor DAC. Once the listening volume level was established, I never changed it.

siltech

When I was casually listening at a lower level and the Siltech versions were being recorded, I freaked out and heard what seemed like stark differences from the previous cables.

Once I finished recording everything, lined up some combinations, found a good listening level, and picked some sections to pay close attention to, most but not all the casual listening differences disappeared. The key phrase here is but not all.

The Mogami was solid but nothing special. Maybe a hair thinner in the lower midrange and not quite as dynamic as some of the others, although the sense of detail was good. The Terry Audio cable seemed to have the most color, but in a pleasing way. A hair darker, yet smooth and harmonically beefier but also a little more congealed sounding.

The Cardas and Siltech were the clear winners. I could hear why I’ve enjoyed Cardas in my system for a while now. It just sounds right. The Siltech, however, had a very pleasing overall tonality with a smidgen more fresh air on top and size in the low end, and also a slightly greater sense of dynamic contrast. It almost sounded louder than the others. I heard more complexity to the amount of information that I usually associate with a pleasing kind of coloration, but this was different. Lots of harmonic micro detail and size, without getting blurry.

I then listened to long stretches of the tunes in a less analytical way, which was difficult at this point but not impossible. Something about the flow and juiciness of the music was greater with the Siltech. Confirmation bias? Maybe, but it was real to me and that’s kind of the whole point. If the listener hears something he or she thinks is worth owning, who is anybody to say otherwise?

Lastly, I compared all the cable passes with the source mix. The source mix was clearly the best. My Prism ADA8 XR is fantastic, but no converter is perfect. So which pass sounded closest to the source? None of them. One listener I invited to hear the results felt that there were more differences between cable types than between the Siltech pass and the source. But the best cable is still no cable. To be fair I can’t remove the sound of the Prism converter from the test although I think it’s valid for comparing all passes recorded through it.

dave mcnair and speedy

Back At The Crib With Siltech 880

Since it takes too long to unhook and swap out an entire group of cables with any real hope of retaining enough aural memory for the minuscule differences between cables, I didn’t do much of that. I did do that a few times with the speaker cables, but even that proved to be inconclusive. It’s not that I didn’t hear differences when swapping out for my reference Cardas Clear Beyond speaker cable, it just didn’t seem stark given the length of time between samples. I should also mention that during the review period I also used Siltech power cords on the DACs, preamp, and power amps.

Yeah, let’s talk about power cables for a minute.

I saved this test for a lazy Sunday afternoon when my ears and mood were in good shape. I wanted the test to be as much of a stark contrast as possible because in the past I have never been able to hear any difference whatsoever in fancy power cables. I mean, really? How could it possibly do a damn thing as the last few feet in a long chain of mystery wire and connections? If the power supply in a component is correctly designed all should be well with any old decently made power cord, right? Apparently not, mi amigo.

For this test, the core system consisted of the most excellent Von Schweikert Audio Ultra 55 loudspeaker, Valve Amplification Company Master Preamplifier, and Parasound JC-1+ power amps. Later I added the newest offering from VAC, a pair of insanely great-sounding Master 300 Musicbloc amplifiers.

I selected the Ideon Audio Absolute (make mine a double with a twist) that I have in for a review, as my power cable Guinea Pig. Spoiler alert: the Absolute is the best sounding DAC I’ve yet to hear in my system.

siltech and ideon

I tested the Siltech Legend series 880 power cord against a beefy gauge, but generic black power cord. To make it even more interesting I did this comparison in two ways: with the cords plugged directly into a standard duplex wall socket OR plugged into a Cardas Audio Nautilus power bar. I didn’t have enough Siltech power cables on hand to run the amps, preamp, DAC, and the power connection from the Cardas bar to the wall plug so I used a Cardas power cable there.

SONOFAMOTHERFLIPPINGUN. Although subtle, I heard differences. A larger observable sonic contrast between the straight outta wall comparisons, but the results were similar even after some love from the filtered Cardas power bar.

I used two tunes for this test, “Qualquim Coisa” performed by Caetano Veloso off of Los Super Seven – Canto, and “Fast As I Can” from the Fiona Apple album When The Pawn…

The stock cable was just a little bit more nervous and jumpy sounding. Less separation of textures, and generally a mite edgier. Similar to the line-level cable tests, the Siltech 880 power cords almost seemed a bit louder, certainly more fluid, and refined. Textures had a tighter weave to the fundamental flow of the music and things just sounded more expensive. The differences were more subtle using the Caetano Veloso song, even though I know this one well having recorded and mixed it–all analog tape, no less.  I’ve noticed many times that very open, minimalist recordings like this one sound pretty effin awesome regardless. But the density and wider pallet of harmonic flavors, and transient information in “Fast As I Can” proved conclusive.

I am fully able to admit to confirmation bias for the power cable and speaker cable tests. I would not swear on my life that these differences were anything other than what I thought I wanted to hear. But on that day, with those tunes, and whatever mindset I was in, I heard what I heard. And I liked it!

Unlike the IC and power cord tests, I didn’t come up with anything conclusive for speaker cable comparisons. It simply took too long to switch. The Siltech and Cardas cables both were spade lugs, and the amp and speaker posts were a variety that was not quick and easy. I don’t trust a comparison that has many minutes in between samples. And as previously stated, I give much less credence to long-term observations because the brain has a very strong tendency to adapt and rewire itself to long-term sensory input. My real reason for wanting to live for a while with a component under review is to average my impressions owing to different moods over several listening sessions. How many times have you sat down to play some music and thought “ Wow, my system is killing today!”  Or, “Why does everything I play sound kinda shitty, tonight?” It happens to reviewers too.

The possible exception for me not putting much weight into long-term listening impressions are DACs. I’ve found many DACs will initially sound quite similar, yet extended listening will reveal over time what my ear may grow not to like. My pal and colleague Grover Neville likes to say the best sounding DAC is the one that, over time, you find the least offensive. For me, cables may also exist in this subtle but ultimately meaningful area as well. I will point out that I did hear a bit more clarity when I made some comparisons to Siltech 880 speaker cables when Credo EV One speakers were in the system. At the studio, I was able to set up a more rapid swap on the Acora/Pass Labs system. I heard some small changes there as well, so the speaker cable thing wasn’t a total wash.

Jon Baker and Rich Maez, of Siltech distributor Monarch Systems, were kind enough to send the proverbial baker’s dozen in the form of a Siltech USB cable so I could compare that. I have done digital cable comparisons at my studio and they always null 100% with a 180-degree phase flip which is the gold standard in pro audio tests. That means zero difference. I didn’t try the Siltech USB at the studio but did do a few swaps for a generic USB cable going from my Innuos Zen Mini streamer to the Ideon Absolute. Less conclusive than the power and IC tests but still, I heard something different happening. Really? Damn. Could I pick either in a blind test? No way, Jose.

siltech and vac

Siltech Classic Legend 880 Conclusion

Well, I think I’ve said all that I wanted to say.

I didn’t say a whole lot about all the cutting-edge science in the design and construction of Siltech cables. Mainly because if I’m honest, I really couldn’t care less. How it sounds in my system and how much it’s gonna cost me are pretty much my only areas of interest, at least with cables. I don’t need fancy looks, complex science, and impressive packaging to be impressed, although Siltech most definitely excels in all those areas. And for the folks that like to know there is a definite science behind a design, Siltech may be the most serious player in this area.

I had a blast using the cables and more importantly, I learned that I can sometimes, under certain conditions, hear differences in cables. What does that mean for my system?

As far as the Siltech Classic Legend 880, I definitely felt they brought a new level of overall listening enjoyment to my ears in the form of a hard-to-describe sense of luxuriousness to the sound. If they have any major sonic signature it’s the same as all my other favorite components: large, complex, dynamically revealing, yet smooth. I will be a little bummed when they go back to Monarch Systems, although I’m perfectly fine with the performance I get using Cardas Clear Beyond. However, I very well may have to throw down for some at the studio. My kingdom for a power cord!

I feel like cables are the last tiny bit of seasoning on a perfectly cooked meal.

Does an expertly cooked meal that uses the best, freshest ingredients ever really need added salt and pepper? Does a few grains of salt on a perfect tomato at its peak, enhance the taste experience? How much would you spend on that salt? Is the value-added for the salt different for a tomato versus a steak? Does Himalayan, organic, free traded salt taste better than Morton’s?  Is there a best type and source of pepper, above all others? Do these questions mean different things to a typical eater as opposed to a hard-core foodie?

I know what my answers are to the questions posed above. I’ll let readers answer for themselves.

Siltech Classic Legend series MSRP prices start at:

880P power cord: $2,400 ea

880I interconnects: $3,168 pr

880L speaker cable: $7,176 pr

siltech power cords

back panel detail

siltech

dave mcnair system

dave mcnair system





2 Comments

  1. Agreed. I trust my long(er) term listening a bit more. Even then, I can get fooled. More often than not, I prefer not to think about any of this stuff and simply enjoy what I’m listening to.

  2. Wow, what complicated procedure. It’s true that aural (and visual) memory, for the majority of people who don’t have photographic memory, is very short-term. But longer-term memory, based on observing and characterizing the features of what we hear (or see) serves us accurately and well for everyday purposes. And yes, confirmation bias exists — but it can be pretty short-term too. I used to add bass with my tone controls, then sit back satisfied — Ahh, that’s better. But soon I’d think: I guess I didn’t add enough. So I added more: Ahh, that’s better. But then … I’d realize I had “tone defeat” on. So at first bias existed — I THOUGHT I was hearing more bass. THEN, my naturally dependable hearing kicked in and I realized I WASN’T hearing more. So confirmation bias isn’t necessarily a persistent feature.

    Also: this “last few feet of wire” thing is wrong. Your system exists within a long loop of alternating current. Changing the cabling changes the conditions within the local part of that loop, not “the last few feet.”

    So, trust your ears. But train them first.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. SILTECH Classic Legend 880 Cables – Absolute Hi End

Got something for this?